In the Sweltering Southwest, Planting Solar Panels in Farmland Can Help Both Photovoltaics and Crops

posted in: Climate Change | 2

By Tina Deines, Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment.
Sign up for their newsletter here.

Brittany Staie, with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, gathers samples of vegetables that are being grown at the NREL agrivoltaic solar garden in Golden, Colo. Credit: Werner Slocum/NREL

“We were getting basil leaves the size of your palm,” University of Arizona researcher Greg Barron-Gafford said, describing some of the benefits he and his team have seen farming under solar panels in the Tucson desert.

For 12 years, Barron-Gafford has been investigating agrivoltaics, the integration of solar arrays into working farmland. This practice involves growing crops or other vegetation, such as pollinator-friendly plants, under solar panels, and sometimes grazing livestock in this greenery. Though a relatively new concept, at least 604 agrivoltaic sites have popped up across the United States, according to OpenEI

Researchers like Barron-Gafford think that, in addition to generating carbon-free electricity, agrivoltaics could offer a ray of hope for agriculture in an increasingly hotter and drier Southwest, as the shade created by these systems has been found to decrease irrigation needs and eliminate heat stress on crops. Plus, the cooling effects of growing plants under solar arrays can actually make the panels work better.

But challenges remain, including some farmers’ attitudes about the practice and funding difficulties. 


Greg Barron-Gafford under the panels at Biosphere 2. Credit: Agrisolar Clearinghouse.

Overcoming a Climate Conundrum

While renewable electricity from sources like solar panels is one of the most frequently touted energy solutions to help reduce the carbon pollution that’s driving climate change, the warming climate itself is making it harder for solar arrays to do their job, Barron-Gafford said. An optimal functioning temperature for panels is around 75 degrees Fahrenheit, he explained. Beyond that, any temperature increase reduces the photovoltaic cells’ efficiency. 

“You can quickly see how this solution for our changing climate of switching to more renewable energy is itself sensitive to the changing climate,” he said.

This problem is especially pertinent in the Southwest, where historically hot temperatures are steadily increasing. Tucson, for instance, saw a record-breaking 112 days of triple-digit heat in 2024, according to National Weather Service Data, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reports that every part of the Southwest experienced higher average temperatures between 2000 and 2023 compared to the long-term average from 1895 to 2023.

However, planting vegetation under solar panels—as opposed to the more traditional method of siting solar arrays on somewhat barren land—can help cool them. In one set of experiments, Barron-Gafford’s team found that planting cilantro, tomatoes and peppers under solar arrays reduced the panels’ surface temperature by around 18 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s because plants release moisture into the air during their respiration process, in which they exchange oxygen for carbon dioxide. 


Byron Kominek, owner of Jack’s Solar Garden drives a tractor on the farm. Credit: Werner Slocum / NREL

Throwing Shade

While Barron-Gafford said some laughed him off when he first proposed the idea of growing crops in the shade of solar panels, this added sun shield can actually help them grow better, especially in the Southwest, where many backyard gardeners already employ shade cloths to protect their gardens from the blazing heat. 

“Many people don’t understand that in Colorado and much of the West, most plants get far too much sunlight,” said Byron Kominek, owner/manager of Jack’s Solar Garden in Boulder County, Colorado, which began implementing agrivoltaics in 2020. “Having some shade is a benefit to them.”

Jack’s Solar Garden has integrated 3,276 solar panels over about four acres of farmland, growing crops like greens and tomatoes. Meg Caley with Sprout City Farms, a nonprofit that helps with farming duties at Jack’s Solar Garden, said they’ve been able to produce Swiss chard “the size of your torso.” 

“The greens just get huge,” she said. “You have to chop them up to fit them in your refrigerator.”

She added that the shade seems to improve the flavor of the vegetables and prevents them from bolting, when plants prematurely produce flowers and seeds, diverting energy away from leaf or root growth.

“Plants when they’re stressed out can have more of a bitter flavor,” she explained. “So the arugula that we grow is not as bitter or spicy. It’s sweeter. The spinach is sweeter too.”

Barron-Gafford and his team are seeing the same thing in Arizona, where they grow a variety of produce like beans, artichokes, potatoes, kale and basil.

“We’ve grown 30-plus different types of things across different wet winters and dry winters and exceptionally hot summers, dry summers, average or close to average summers,” he said of the solar-shaded crops. “And across everything we’ve done, we’ve seen equal or greater production down here in the Southwest, the dry land environments, where it really benefits to get some shade.”

As in Colorado, some of those crops are growing to epic proportions. 

“We’ve made bok choy the size of a toddler,” Barron-Gafford said.

All that shade provides another important benefit in a drought-stricken Southwest—lower water requirements for crops. Because less direct sunlight is hitting the ground, it decreases the evaporation rate, which means water stays in the soil longer after irrigation. Barron-Gafford and his team have been running experiments for the last seven or so years to see how this plays out with different crops in an agrivoltaic setting. 

“What is the evaporation rate under something that’s big and bushy like a bean or potato plant versus something thinner above ground, like a carrot?” is one of the questions Barron-Gafford said they have tried to answer. “For the most part, I would say that we are able to cut back our irrigation by more than half.”

They are partnering with Jack’s Solar Farm on water research in Colorado and have so far found similar results there. 

This shade has another benefit in a warming world—respite for farmworkers. Heat-related illnesses are a growing concern for people who work outside, and one recent study predicted climate change will quadruple U.S. outdoor workers’ exposure to extreme heat conditions by 2065.

But with solar arrays in the fields, “if you really carefully plan out your day, you can work in the shade,” a factor that can help increase worker safety on hot days, Caley said.

The AgriSolar Clearinghouse performed skin temperature readings under solar panels and full sun at a number of sites across the United States, finding a skin temperature decrease of 15.3 degrees in Boulder and 20.8 degrees in Phoenix.


Credit: Rob Davis, Agrisolar Clearinghouse

“I Don’t Know What the Future Holds”

Despite the benefits of agrivoltaics, the up-front cost of purchasing a solar array remains a barrier to farmers. 

“Once people see the potential of agrivoltaics, you run into the next challenge, which is how do you fund someone getting into this on their site?” Barron-Gafford said. “And depending on the amount of capital or access to capital that a farmer has, you’re going to get a wildly different answer.”

While expenses are dependent on the size of the installation, a 25 kilowatt system would require an upfront cost of around $67,750, according to AgriSolar Clearinghouse. For comparison, the median size of a residential solar array in 2018 was around 6kW, the organization stated, which would cost around $16,260 to install.

Kominek said the total initial cost of implementing a 1.2 megawatt capacity agrivoltaics setup on his farm in Colorado was around $2 million, but that the investment has paid off. In addition to the revenue he earns from farming, all of the energy produced by the arrays is sold to clients in the community through a local utility company, earning the farm money.

The Rural Energy for America program has been one resource for farmers interested in agrivoltaics, offering loans and grants to help install solar. However, it’s unclear how this program will move forward amid current federal spending cuts.

Meanwhile, some of the federal grant programs that Barron-Gafford has relied on have suddenly come to a halt, he said, putting his research in danger. But, as federal support dries up, some states are charging on with their own funding opportunities to develop farm field solar projects. For instance, Colorado’s Agrivoltaics Research and Demonstration Grant offers money for demonstrations of agrivoltaics, research projects and outreach campaigns.

There are other challenges as well. Caley, for instance, said farming around solar panels is akin to working in an “obstacle course.” She and her team, who mostly work manually, have found ways to work around them by being aware of their surroundings so that they don’t accidentally collide with the panels or strike them with their tools. This job is also made easier since Kominek invested between $80,000 and $100,000 to elevate his farm’s panels, which better allows animals, taller crops and farming equipment to operate beneath.

Still, a 2025 University of Arizona study that interviewed farmers and government officials in Pinal County, Arizona, found that a number of them questioned agrivoltaics’ compatibility with large-scale agriculture.

“I think it’s a great idea, but the only thing … it wouldn’t be cost-efficient … everything now with labor and cost of everything, fuel, tractors, it almost has to be super big … to do as much with as least amount of people as possible,” one farmer stated.

Many farmers are also leery of solar, worrying that agrivoltaics could take working farmland out of use, affect their current operations or deteriorate soils.

Those fears have been amplified by larger utility-scale initiatives, like Ohio’s planned Oak Run Solar Project, an 800 megawatt project that will include 300 megawatts of battery storage, 4,000 acres of crops and 1,000 grazing sheep in what will be the country’s largest agrivoltaics endeavor to date. Opponents of the project worry about its visual impacts and the potential loss of farmland.


2 Responses

  1. eduardo krasilovsky, Psy.D.

    Over half a century ago we were promised that ‘green energy’ will solve our Global Warming conundrum. But, as it turned out, it didn’t and, in addition, it contributes CO2 and other damaging gases that contribute to the GHG effect. The sourcing of materials for solar panels and wind turbines requires the use of fossil fuels as their disposal does.
    So, what do we do?
    We invest in upgrading our homes with extra insulation, especially our homes’ roofs (with an R equivalent of 60 and higher. We transform our homes into Passive Solar homes, we increase the size of our overhangs so that they project shade on all walls including 2 feet away from them.
    We build appropriate size porches with insulated roofs to help keep the house cooler.
    And all these changes will help our homes to be cooler for the next 5-7 years because Global Warming is Unstoppable.
    Even if we moved all 8 billion of us to Mars today the Earth will continue warming up.
    What we can do is plant trees in our cities, especially here in Santa Fe, NM
    https://onetreeplanted.org/blogs/stories/urban-forestry-benefits?srsltid=AfmBOor335_OTOyFvXEXMovo4T41xA0gQsfEqVT0ejAGfmm47vrlVb_j

    https://www.phoenix.gov/administration/departments/parks/about-us/phoenixs-urban-forest.html
    So, it seems, as it has always been, that working in tandem with nature is the best and only way to act. We need the knowledge and the will for Regenerating the earth which will give Life a chance. (See Joe Brewer’s book: https://legacyproject.org/books/tdp.html )
    I strongly believe that the ‘Green Technology’ approach is distracting us from the real work we need to do. All the solutions are out there, given to us by our planet.
    Thank you for writing this blog,
    eduardo
    PS. Another important action would be to gather in small groups to talk about GW. People are scared, even terrified by it and try to deny it and/or to put it in the ‘back burner’. But this a wicked problem which we need, or must, to befriend it!

    • admin

      Thank you for your thoughtful remarks, Eduardo. Bill Mc Kibben recently noted in the New Yorker (4.6 Billion Years On, the Sun Is Having a Moment) that we’re getting much more efficient at recycling solar panels and because new ones are made with less of the precious minerals, one old panel provides the materials for many new ones. A very hopeful development.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *